[mch2021-terrain] [Logistics-leads] Fencing for Boneyard

[Manduca]

Hi,

Made my own drawing on my view on the logistics area.
It also has the roadplates included (not on scale, but I want the long 6 meter ones).

The idea is not to have any large logistics trucks over the terrein (so entrance and exit to the west).
And LSD-trip should be clear of visitors (hence the “closure” in the south and “north”. Waste gators and fotklifts should be able to pass off course).

Btw: our (historic) name for the storage area is “Logistics Storage Domain (LSD)” with the entrance road called LSD-trip (puns intended). We don’t use Boneyard.



> On 21 Nov 2024, at 23:07, Gina Muuss <chaos at updownup.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Team:Terrain is currently discussing Fencing and the question came up what kind and how much fencing you would like for the Boneyard.
> As you can see from this draft of the map:
> 
> <test.png>
> 
> The Boneyard effectively has a moat except for a tiny bridge in the north-west. (We think this bridge is about half a meter wide).
> In the current map there is fence number 5, meant as access control for the Boneyard.
> 
> We were wondering:
> - Is the access control fence necessary and what type of fence would you like?
> - Would you like the boneyard to be fenced off entirely, despite the moat?
> - If not, would you like the small bridge to be fenced off?
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Gina
> 
> --
> Logistics-leads mailing list
> Logistics-leads at lists.why2025.org
> https://lists.why2025.org/mailman/listinfo/logistics-leads

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.why2025.org/pipermail/terrain/attachments/20241202/4bf88bba/attachment.html>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cid:7FCD5153-E6BC-4EA4-BDE2-7866322837E7.png
Type: image/png
Size: 298705 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.why2025.org/pipermail/terrain/attachments/20241202/4bf88bba/attachment.png>